Sundberg v. Keller Ladder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the plaintiff must show that “the product in question was . . . defective”
• stating that a plaintiff can prevail “even if none of the three types of ‘defects’ (i.e. design, manufacture or warning) could support the jury’s finding”
• stating that “it is not the office of a reply brief to raise issues for the first time” (citation omitted)
• noting, in the context of summary judgment, “it is not the office of a reply brief to raise issues for the first time” (citation omitted)
• declining to address an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief
• “[I]t is not the office of a reply brief to raise issues for the first time.” (citing United States v. Perkins, 994 F.2d 1184, 1191 (6th Cir. 1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).