Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when faced with a Rule 12(b)(6
• dismissal warranted because, inter alia, “[sjpecifically, the Court concludes that Versata has not adequately alleged the boundaries of the relevant market ...”
• allegations upon information and belief that patent infringement claims are made in bad faith and that party engaged in fraud satisfied Rule 9(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).