Skip to main content
· 12/31/2002

McInerney v. Moyer Lumber and Hardware, Inc.

Citations

  • 244 F. Supp. 2d 393
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25047
  • 2002 WL 31928450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases holding administrative remedies were exhausted when named in the body of the complaint
  • “[T]here is no right to recover for loss of consortium in connection with a spouse’s . . . PHRA claims.”
  • owner/chief executive officer dismissed due to lack of notice that he could be sued in his individual capacity
  • “Rule 12(h)(2) deals with raising the defense of failure to state a claim in the answer or in an appropriate post-answer vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rufe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.