Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “existence of legitimate business justifications for the [exclusive dealing] contracts also supports the legality of the global contracts”
• explaining that courts must ―evaluate the restrictiveness and the economic usefulness of the challenged practice in relation to the business factors extant in the market‖
• explaining that courts must “evaluate the restrictiveness and the economic usefulness of the challenged practice in relation to the business factors extant in the market”
• acknowledging that the first question is whether there is an agreement to exclusivity
• remarking “market share of 47-50% alone [is] not enough to establish dangerous probability of success”
• remarking on a previous decision and observing that “we condemned the district court’s practice of bifurcating trials as a general rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).