Skip to main content

State v. Peterson

Citations

  • 296 Kan. 563
  • 293 P.3d 730
  • 2013 WL 475775
  • 2013 Kan. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 6 resentencing before a different judge is the typical remedy for the State's breach of a plea agreement
  • holding that resentencing before different judge remedy for State's breach of plea agreement
  • declining to address whether breach of plea agreement was subject to constitutional harmless error standard because State failed to pursue the argument
  • declining to address whether breach of plea agreement was subject to constitutional harmless error standard because State failed to pursue the argument
  • describing resentencing in front of a different judge as one of two typical remedies, the other being withdrawal of the plea
  • suggesting a defendant would not be entitled to a remedy for the State's breach if the reviewing court could say there was no reasonable possibility the breach contributed to the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Johnson, Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.