· 1/30/2009
Sud-Chemie, Inc. v. Multisorb Technologies, Inc.
Citations
- 554 F.3d 1001
- 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1768
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1640
- 2009 WL 212413
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming finding that reference disclosed “uncoat- ed” film where it did not describe the film as coated and did not suggest necessity of coatings
- affirming finding that reference disclosed “uncoated” film where it did not describe the film as coated and did not sug- gest necessity of coatings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Friedman, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.