Skip to main content
· 1/30/2009

Sud-Chemie, Inc. v. Multisorb Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 554 F.3d 1001
  • 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1768
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1640
  • 2009 WL 212413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming finding that reference disclosed “uncoat- ed” film where it did not describe the film as coated and did not suggest necessity of coatings
  • affirming finding that reference disclosed “uncoated” film where it did not describe the film as coated and did not sug- gest necessity of coatings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Friedman, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.