Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a pharmaceutical formulation “coextensive” with the asserted claims where it was an “inextricable and essential part of what doctors are prescribing” and “not a part that can be separated out from the remainder of the product”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).