Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/1/1998
Stull v. Hoke
Citations
- 957 P.2d 173
- 153 Or. App. 261
- 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 402
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming in part and reversing in part our opinion in Stull v. Hoke, 141 Or App 150, 917 P2d 69 (1996), and remanding to this court for further proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court· 1997-11-14· cited 232×
- Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court· 1990-08-16· cited 59×
- Hoeck v. Schwabe, Williamson & WyattCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-10· cited 25×
- Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-02· cited 13×
- Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 12×
- Gallogly v. CalhoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-16· cited 10×
- Yen Linh Thi Pham v. FaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 10×
- Business & Professional Adjustment Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-16· cited 9×
- Stull v. HokeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.