Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/10/1997
Hoeck v. Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt
Citations
- 945 P.2d 534
- 149 Or. App. 607
- 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that service on receptionist at defendant’s place of business, followed by service by certified mail, was adequate
- noting that, while “service by unregistered mail by itself is not adequate to satisfy the reasonable notice requirement of ORCP 7 D(l),” a “follow-up mailing by unrestricted delivery, coupled with other forms of service,” may be sufficient
- discussing the various circumstances in which service of that kind has been held adequate
- finding follow-up mailing, “coupled with other forms of service,” constituted reasonable service
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Landau, Leeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP v. MenkenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 18×
- Padrick v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 14×
- Yen Linh Thi Pham v. FaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 10×
- Keller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-09· cited 9×
- Johnson v. Multnomah County Department of Community JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-01-31· cited 7×
- Cairns v. DoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-20· cited 7×
- Option One Mortgage Corp. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-24· cited 6×
- Stull v. HokeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-01· cited 6×
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-01-02· cited 5×
- Willamette River I v. BoespflugCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 5×
- Brownstein, Rask, Arenz, Sweeney, Kerr & Grim v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-08· cited 4×
- Williams v. JettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-09-25· cited 2×
- State v. ChapmanOregon Supreme Court· 2020-12-31· cited 2×
- CKH Family Ltd. v. Holt Homes, Inc.D. Oregon· 2018-01-29
- Department of Human Services v. K. G. A. B.Deschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-18
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court· 1993-05-13· cited 198×
- Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court· 1994-01-06· cited 169×
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court· 1976-04-15· cited 128×
- Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court· 1990-08-16· cited 59×
- Murphy v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 17×
- Duber v. ZeitlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-17· cited 16×
- Cavan v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-11-29· cited 14×
- Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-02· cited 13×
- Gehrke v. CrafCo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-09-18· cited 12×
- Gallogly v. CalhoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-16· cited 10×
- Abbotts v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-03-08· cited 9×
- Business & Professional Adjustment Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-16· cited 9×
- Branch v. HensgenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-20· cited 6×
- Beckett v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 5×
- Lonsdale v. SwartCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-09-04· cited 3×
- Erwin & Erwin v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.