Edwards v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “No Oregon case upholds service by mail as adequate unless it is acknowledged by defendant. * * * Analogous federal mailed-service rules require acknowledgment of receipt for delivery.”
• “No Oregon case upholds service by mail as adequate unless it is acknowledged by defendant”
• “No Oregon case upholds service of summons by mail as adequate unless receipt is acknowledged by defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP v. Menken
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 18×
• Murphy v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 17×
• Starr v. George
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-01-18· cited 14×
• Levens v. Koser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-16· cited 13×
• Yen Linh Thi Pham v. Faber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 10×
• Campos v. Chisholm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 9×
• Stull v. Hoke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-01· cited 6×
• Willamette River I v. Boespflug
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 5×
• Lonsdale v. Swart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-09-04· cited 3×