First Circuit· 8/26/1977
Stull v. Bayard
Citations
- 561 F.2d 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that limitations periods are calculated “from the last wrongful act committed by defendants” and implicitly rejecting proposal for “an outside cut-off period,” which would exclude earlier acts comprising the same violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 1,015×
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
- Iit, An International Investment Trust v. Bernard CornfeldSecond Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 179×
- IIT v. CornfeldSecond Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 163×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,649 Jean Lorelle Burke v. Robert E. JacobySecond Circuit· 1992-12-29· cited 94×
- Louis P. Singer, as Successor in Interest to Troster, Singer & Co., Cross-Appellant v. Olympia Brewing Company, Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1989-06-28· cited 90×
- Zola v. GordonS.D. New York· 1988-05-04· cited 85×
- Maiden v. BiehlS.D. New York· 1984-03-16· cited 29×
- Guenter v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.California Court of Appeal· 1983-03-01· cited 28×
- Farley v. Baird, Patrick & Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1990-11-19· cited 25×
- Goodman v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.S.D. New York· 1988-01-14· cited 12×
- CSI Investment Partners II, L.P. v. Cendant Corp.S.D. New York· 2001-03-29· cited 10×
- Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokS.D. New York· 2003-10-23· cited 7×
- Bilick v. Eagle Electric Manufacturing Co.E.D. New York· 1992-11-02· cited 6×
- Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokS.D. New York· 2003-03-05· cited 6×
- Hemmerdinger Corp. v. RuoccoE.D. New York· 2013-10-07· cited 5×
- Rohland v. Syn-Fuel Associates-1982 Ltd. PartnershipS.D. New York· 1995-03-03· cited 5×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-02-23· cited 704×
- Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 428×
- Wahba v. New York UniversitySupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 264×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle MizeFifth Circuit· 1974-02-19· cited 238×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,865 James Arneil and Vernon A. Stockwell v. James B. Ramsey, Jr.Second Circuit· 1977-02-16· cited 199×
- Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.Second Circuit· 1969-01-24· cited 197×
- Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman v. R. Philip SmithNinth Circuit· 1962-12-20· cited 164×
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,223, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,220 Berry Petroleum Company, an Arkansas Corp. (Dissolved) v. Adams & PeckSecond Circuit· 1975-06-23· cited 148×
- Dr. D. W. NEWMAN Et Al., Appellees, v. Ferrell PRIOR, AppellantFourth Circuit· 1975-06-17· cited 135×
- Barbara B. Sack v. V. T. Low, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name of Bear, Stearns & Co., and Richard W. SilvermanSecond Circuit· 1973-04-13· cited 134×
- Parrent v. Midwest Rug Mills, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1972-01-26· cited 130×
- Azalea Meats, Inc. v. Victor Muscat and Edward KrockFifth Circuit· 1967-11-22· cited 123×
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaSixth Circuit· 1961-02-06· cited 101×
- Ernest Klein v. Shields & Company and Warner G. Cosgrove, Jr.Second Circuit· 1972-12-08· cited 75×
- Stull v. BayardSecond Circuit· 1977-08-26· cited 73×
- Lowenschuss v. KaneSecond Circuit· 1975-05-27· cited 68×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,390 Stanley S. Pearlstein, and Cross-Appellant v. Scudder & German, a Partnership, and Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1975-12-24· cited 46×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,513 Reuben P. Hughes v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 1976-06-04· cited 42×
- Stull v. PoolS.D. New York· 1974-04-30· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.