S.D. New York· 11/19/1990
Farley v. Baird, Patrick & Co., Inc.
Citations
- 750 F. Supp. 1209
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15504
- 1990 WL 181003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing locus of injury to individual plaintiff in securities fraud claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mukasey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1993-02-11· cited 108×
- In Re AES Corp. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1993-06-25· cited 68×
- In re Amerifirst Securities LitigationS.D. Florida· 1991-08-08· cited 49×
- Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. KapoorN.D. Illinois· 1993-02-10· cited 30×
- Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc.D. Colorado· 1991-05-09· cited 23×
- McMahan & Co. v. Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc.S.D. New York· 1994-08-10· cited 19×
- Merine Ex Rel. Prudential-Bache Utility Fund, Inc. v. Prudential-Bache Utility Fund, Inc.S.D. New York· 1994-08-05· cited 14×
- Varnberg v. MinnickS.D. New York· 1991-03-13· cited 14×
- Klein v. GoetzmannN.D. New York· 1991-07-12· cited 12×
- PPM America, Inc. v. Marriott Corp.D. Maryland· 1993-04-22· cited 10×
- Newman v. Comprehensive Care Corp.D. Oregon· 1992-04-22· cited 9×
- Maslan v. American Airlines, Inc.S.D. New York· 1995-05-03· cited 8×
- Reed v. Prudential Securities Inc.S.D. Texas· 1995-02-03· cited 7×
- Shochat v. WeiszE.D. New York· 1991-02-21· cited 6×
- Bilick v. Eagle Electric Manufacturing Co.E.D. New York· 1992-11-02· cited 6×
- Rubinberg v. Hydronic Fabrications, Inc.E.D. New York· 1991-10-01· cited 5×
- Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. HirschS.D. Florida· 1992-10-23· cited 4×
- Hirschfeld v. Total Health Systems, Inc.E.D. New York· 1991-10-09· cited 4×
- Asdourian v. KonstantinE.D. New York· 1999-12-21· cited 4×
- Arizona Premium Finance, Inc. v. BielliE.D. New York· 1999-12-21· cited 3×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 857×
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIISecond Circuit· 1987-11-25· cited 734×
- United States v. Anthony IndelicatoSecond Circuit· 1989-01-13· cited 364×
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 327×
- Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Second Circuit· 1987-06-01· cited 272×
- Luce v. EdelsteinSecond Circuit· 1986-09-26· cited 234×
- Cosmas v. HassettSecond Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 233×
- In Re Data Access Systems Securities Litigation. Appeal of Tolins & Lowenfels & Roger A. Tolins. Appeal of I. Kahlowsky and Co. And Peter CunicelliThird Circuit· 1988-04-08· cited 218×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,379 Marian W. Short v. Belleville Shoe Manufacturing CompanySeventh Circuit· 1990-07-30· cited 183×
- Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanySecond Circuit· 1984-06-14· cited 156×
- Armstrong v. McalpinSecond Circuit· 1983-01-24· cited 145×
- DiVittorio v. Equidyne Extractive Industries, Inc.Second Circuit· 1987-06-26· cited 136×
- Barbara B. Sack v. V. T. Low, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name of Bear, Stearns & Co., and Richard W. SilvermanSecond Circuit· 1973-04-13· cited 134×
- Albert v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of MarquetteSupreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 132×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.