Skip to main content

Stuart v. Stuart

Citations

  • 962 A.2d 842
  • 112 Conn. App. 160
  • 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking unjust enrichment claim when plaintiffs failed to allege facts to justify piercing the corporate veil
  • appeal from attorney’s fees award not final where court had not determined amount of fees at time appeal filed
  • ‘‘[u]nder . . . § 52- 552i (b), the [trial] court can award the value of the asset transferred as damages’’ (emphasis added; foot- note omitted)
  • “Courts typically apply some rate less than the 10% available under § 37-3a.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLachlan, Robinson, Pellegrino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.