Connecticut Appellate Court· 1/20/2009
Stuart v. Stuart
Citations
- 962 A.2d 842
- 112 Conn. App. 160
- 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking unjust enrichment claim when plaintiffs failed to allege facts to justify piercing the corporate veil
- appeal from attorney’s fees award not final where court had not determined amount of fees at time appeal filed
- ‘‘[u]nder . . . § 52- 552i (b), the [trial] court can award the value of the asset transferred as damages’’ (emphasis added; foot- note omitted)
- “Courts typically apply some rate less than the 10% available under § 37-3a.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McLachlan, Robinson, Pellegrino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-22· cited 82×
- Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-10· cited 35×
- Auerbach v. AuerbachConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-24· cited 28×
- Gorelick v. MontanaroConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-03-16· cited 13×
- Froom Development Corp. v. Developers Realty, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-02· cited 13×
- State v. Richard W.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-16· cited 12×
- Sullivan v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-25· cited 11×
- Stuart v. FreibergConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-05-21· cited 10×
- Reyes v. ChettaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-07-02· cited 8×
- Town of Canterbury v. DeojayConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-02· cited 7×
- Przekopski v. PrzekopConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-10-05· cited 4×
- Featherston v. Katchko & Son Construction Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-12-22· cited 3×
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-03-05· cited 1×
- Abele Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Sono Stone & Gravel, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-07-08
- Stuart v. FreibergSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-05-19
- Pryor v. PryorConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-01-19
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 301×
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-27· cited 203×
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-10· cited 198×
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-03· cited 146×
- Jewett v. JewettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-09· cited 76×
- Paranteau v. DeVitaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-08-09· cited 58×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 58×
- Suarez-Negrete v. TrottaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-01-27· cited 58×
- Peters Production, Inc. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-12-16· cited 51×
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-21· cited 51×
- Drabik v. Town of East LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-25· cited 49×
- Schaffer v. LindyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-07-08· cited 42×
- Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-10-26· cited 33×
- Wilson v. HryniewiczConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-08-15· cited 26×
- Wieselman v. HoenigerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-09-04· cited 23×
- Ingels v. SaldanaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-09-11· cited 21×
- Howard v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-13· cited 21×
- Bicio v. BrewerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-01· cited 21×
- Rollar Construction & Demolition, Inc. v. Granite Rock Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-03-07· cited 21×
- Solek v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-05-06· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.