Ingels v. Saldana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[w]e decline to address the issue briefed because it is irrelevant to the judgment from which the defendant appeals’’
• court declined to address merits of appellant’s breach of contract claim because trial court based its decision on breach of fiduciary duty and, thus, claim was ‘‘irrelevant to the judgment from which the defendant appeal[ed]’’
• court declined to address merits of appellant’s claim of error related to breach of contract claim because trial court based its decision on breach of fiduciary duty claim and, thus, claimed error was ‘‘irrelevant to the judgment from which the defendant appeal[ed]’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).