Suarez-Negrete v. Trotta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘Connecticut courts have concluded that the misapplication of a statute’ ” may be raised on appeal for first time
• “ ‘Connecticut courts have concluded that the misapplication of a statute’ ” may be raised for first time on appeal
• “[t]he trial court properly recognized that the plaintiff was required to satisfy the higher standard of proof by clear and convincing evidence to be entitled to an award of treble damages pursuant to § 52-564”
• “[t]he trial court properly recognized that the plaintiff was required to satisfy the higher standard of proof by clear and convincing evidence to be entitled to an award of treble damages pursuant to § 52-564”
• “The trial court properly recognized that the plaintiff was required to satisfy the higher standard of proof by clear and convincing evidence to be entitled to an award of treble damages pursuant to § 52-564.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-12-12· cited 170×
• Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. State
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-11· cited 89×
• Almeida v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2009-12-08· cited 35×
• State v. Rowe
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-07-18· cited 34×
• Mystic Color Lab, Inc. v. Auctions Worldwide, LLC
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-20· cited 32×
• News America Marketing In-Store, Inc. v. Marquis
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-12-21· cited 28×
• Rana v. Terdjanian
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-06-05· cited 25×
• Stuart v. Stuart
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-01-20· cited 24×
• Howard v. MacDonald
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-13· cited 21×
• Ceci Bros. v. Five Twenty-One Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-02-10· cited 16×
• Hutchinson v. Town of Andover
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-11· cited 13×
• Masse v. Perez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-25· cited 11×
• AZTEC. ENERGY PARTNERS, INC. v. Sensor Switch, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2007-10-02· cited 9×
• Bowers v. United States
  D. Connecticut· 2013-03-14· cited 7×
• Chernick v. Johnston
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-03· cited 6×
• Starr v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-12-10· cited 6×
• Lawrence v. Richman Group Capital Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 2005-03-04· cited 5×
• ALV Events International v. Johnson
  D. Connecticut· 2010-08-20· cited 4×
• Marinos v. Poirot
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-12-27· cited 4×
• Kovaco v. Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 2013-09-25· cited 4×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 128×
• Discover Leasing, Inc. v. Murphy
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-12-28· cited 99×
• Lawson v. Whitey's Frame Shop
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-15· cited 94×
• State v. Menillo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-03-11· cited 66×
• Devitt v. Manulik
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-02-27· cited 51×
• Lauder v. Peck
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-02· cited 43×
• Krawiec v. Blake Manor Development Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-02-11· cited 43×
• Schaffer v. Lindy
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-07-08· cited 42×
• Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-07-06· cited 41×
• Maroun v. Tarro
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-08-09· cited 41×
• Lawson v. Whitey's Frame Shop
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-08-20· cited 35×
• Lutynski v. B.B. & J. Trucking, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-31· cited 30×
• Perl v. Case
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-01-01· cited 24×
• Neiditz v. Housing Authority
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-07-30· cited 10×