Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/24/1989
Strong v. State
Citations
- 773 S.W.2d 543
- 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 103
- 1989 WL 54047
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that letter from defendant to co-defendant's lawyer was not privileged
- to invoke the attorney- client privilege under Rule 503(a)(3)’s definition of “lawyer,” appellant must have consulted with a licensed attorney
- instruction to disregard cured witness’s remark that the defendant was on parole
- instruction cured any error from reference to defendant being on parole
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duncan, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cameron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-09-12· cited 254×
- Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-06· cited 59×
- Ates v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2000-03-02· cited 26×
- Sanford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2000-01-06· cited 25×
- Harvey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-02-27· cited 22×
- Neugebauer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1998-07-13· cited 19×
- Kirkland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-28· cited 17×
- Arabzadegan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-12-05· cited 12×
- Kay v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-05-24· cited 10×
- Harris v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-21· cited 9×
- Austin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1995-06-07· cited 5×
- In re SilverCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-08-17· cited 1×
- Lonnie B. Runnels, A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Runnells v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-11-15
- Dana Pierce v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-08-03
- Luke Masood Arabzadegan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-07-18
- Ex Parte Jimmie Lee TownsendTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-06-24
- Alejandro Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-08-10
- Silvestre Saucedo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2008-05-22
- Bina Shahani v. Azhar SaidTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2008-05-22
- Harvey, Belinda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-09-26
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-20· cited 437×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzSecond Circuit· 1973-10-09· cited 303×
- United States v. Robert McPartlinSeventh Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 271×
- West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court· 1978-03-08· cited 270×
- Villarreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-13· cited 157×
- Renz v. BeemanSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 148×
- In re Grand Jury ProceedingsFourth Circuit· 1984-02-24· cited 140×
- United States v. Augustin Alonso LopezTenth Circuit· 1985-11-12· cited 136×
- United States Gypsum Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 116×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-13· cited 115×
- United States v. Walter F. Tellier, Albert Joseph Proctor, Elton B. Jones and Alaska Telephone CorporationSecond Circuit· 1958-05-06· cited 109×
- Eckert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-21· cited 93×
- Continental Oil Company, a Corporation v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-03-27· cited 86×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974S.D. New York· 1975-12-18· cited 78×
- Lee W. Hunydee v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1965-12-20· cited 75×
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-06-26· cited 61×
- United States v. MelvinFifth Circuit· 1981-07-13· cited 44×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Joseph, ShellyThird Circuit· 1982-07-23· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.