Skip to main content

Strickland v. State

Citations

  • 715 S.E.2d 798
  • 311 Ga. App. 400
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2717
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • bolstering did not prejudice defense when victim’s account remained consistent and defendant had opportunity to cross-examine her
  • bolstering did not prejudice defense when victim’s account remained consistent and defendant had opportunity to cross-examine her
  • “It is well established that credibility of a witness is a matter for the jury, and a witness’s credibility may not be bolstered by the opinion of another witness as to whether the witness is telling the truth.”
  • “It is well established that credibility of a witness is a matter for the jury, and a witness’s credibility may not be bolstered by the opinion of another witness as to whether the witness is telling the truth.”
  • detective’s testimony that he ended interview of child and referred her to a child advocacy center when he “ascertained that a molestation incident occurred” was not improper bolstering but rather an explanation as to why he ended the interview

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.