Carrie v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absence of trial counsel’s assumed deficiencies would not in reasonable probability have changed the outcome of defendant’s trial
• considering that jury was allowed to form its own assessment of victim’s credibility and defendant had opportunity to test victim’s credibility in front of the jury
• considering that jury was allowed to form its own assessment of victim's credibility and defendant had opportunity to test victim's credibility in front of the jury
• “this case is yet another example of the worrying trend of trial counsel emphatically and even eagerly testifying to [her] own incompetence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).