E.D. Virginia· 5/22/1988
Strickland v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Citations
- 693 F. Supp. 403
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19342
- 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,697
- 46 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1024
- 1988 WL 85793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that poor work performance was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for an adverse employment action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kellman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tatum v. Hyatt Corp.District of Columbia· 1994-11-16· cited 21×
- Kadiki v. Virginia Commonwealth UniversityE.D. Virginia· 1995-07-26· cited 15×
- Juarez v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1990-09-10· cited 14×
- Gilbert v. Penn-Wheeling Closure Corp.N.D. West Virginia· 1996-03-13· cited 6×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1982-08-09· cited 1,019×
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1985-04-12· cited 754×
- Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 584×
- Katz v. DoleFourth Circuit· 1983-06-01· cited 329×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.