Tatum v. Hyatt Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that common law tort claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress are preempted by WCA
• granting summary judgment to defendant because common law claims, including intentional infliction of emotional distress, were predicated on actions of fellow employee, which employer did not intend
• granting summary judgment for defendants because WCA was exclusive remedy for the plaintiffs injury
• granting summary judgment to defendant because common law claims, including intentional infliction of emotional distress, were predicated on actions of fellow employee, which employer did not intend
• dismissing the plaintiff’s claims of assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress because the WCA provided the exclusive remedy for the plaintiff’s workplace injuries
• co-worker wrapped his arms around plaintiff’s neck and body, rubbed against plaintiff as if to simulate sexual intercourse, made comments about her physical attractiveness, and placed a piece of ice in her skirt pocket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stewart, Sonya v. Evans, Donald L.
  D.C. Circuit· 2002-01-11· cited 363×
• Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao
  District of Columbia· 2004-03-30· cited 36×
• Ramey v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
  District of Columbia· 2006-03-31· cited 32×
• Carson v. Sim
  District of Columbia· 2011-04-22· cited 30×
• Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2004-08-13· cited 18×
• Vanzant v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
  District of Columbia· 2008-06-03· cited 16×
• Chavers v. SHINSEKI
  District of Columbia· 2009-11-05· cited 13×
• Doe v. United States
  District of Columbia· 2011-07-15· cited 12×
• Fowler v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2005-11-09· cited 10×
• Jones v. Potter
  District of Columbia· 2004-01-22· cited 6×
• Diller v. Miami Valley Hosp.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-15· cited 6×
• Fonseca v. Salminen
  District of Columbia· 2012-10-09· cited 2×
• Rucker v. Architect of the Capitol
  District of Columbia· 2012-06-25· cited 2×
• Richardson v. Petasis
  District of Columbia· 2013-11-26
• Doe v. United States of America
  District of Columbia· 2011-07-15
• Chavers v. Mansfield
  District of Columbia· 2009-11-05
• Ham v. Tjx Companies, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2017-09-08
• Staggs v. Smith & Wesson
  District of Columbia· 2022-02-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
• Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
• Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don Schupak
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-04-19· cited 636×
• District of Columbia v. Thompson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-12· cited 90×
• Grillo v. National Bank of Washington
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-03-31· cited 59×
• James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Phillip G. Hillen and Merit Systems Protection Board
  Federal Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 53×
• Harrington v. Moss
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-17· cited 43×
• Elliott v. Healthcare Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-02-26· cited 42×
• Parodi v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-06-20· cited 30×
• Strickland v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
  E.D. Virginia· 1988-05-22· cited 5×