Skip to main content
· 8/29/2006

Street v. Street

Citations

  • 936 So. 2d 1002
  • 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 636
  • 2006 WL 2474040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, despite state's attorney's failure to file timely appeal, defendant's motion to dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction was \without merit because the time limited for filing an appeal is not jurisdictional\
  • concluding that, despite state’s attorney’s failure to file timely appeal, defendant’s motion to dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction was “without merit because the time limited for filing an appeal is not jurisdictional”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Chandler, Griffis, Irving, Ishee, King, Lee, Myers, Roberts, Southwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.