Goodhand v. Kildoo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court “may consider a benefit to the parent from relocation only if the move independently benefits the [child]” (alteration in original) (quoting Cloutier v. Queen, 35 Va. App. 413, 430 (2001))
• stating that “in relocation matters, the moving party . . . bears the burden of proving that relocation will not cause a ‘substantial impairment’ to the relationship between the non-moving parent and the child”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).