Skip to main content

Street v. State

Citations

  • 567 N.E.2d 102
  • 1991 Ind. LEXIS 35
  • 1991 WL 30026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that defendant must show that codefendant would testify in separate trial and that testimony would be exculpatory
  • error to instruct jury that “defendant has the burden of proving that the defendant reached this degree of intoxication”
  • error to instruct jury that \defendant has the burden of proving that the defendant reached this degree of intoxication\
  • instruction required “the defendant to prove a specific fact, his incapacity, which would negate intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Dickson, Krahulik, Givan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.