Indiana Supreme Court· 10/26/1993

Miller v. State

Citations

623 N.E.2d 403
1993 Ind. LEXIS 173
1993 WL 430333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that failure to object to the manner in which the jury was chosen resulted in waiver
finding no error where the prosecutor called the defendant a disparaging name because he was merely commenting on the evidence
statute not unconstitutional because it allows State to present the final closing argument in the penalty phase
statute does not require sentencer to consider irrelevant enumerated mitigating factors, nor does it ascribe too little weight to non-enumerated mitigating factors
error for prosecutor to tell jury prosecutor has duty to present truth while defendant has no such duty
statute not unconstitutional because it allows State to present the final closing argument in the penalty phase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Givan, Debruler, Shepard, Krahulik, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.