Skip to main content

Strahan v. State

Citations

  • 306 S.W.3d 342
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 145
  • 2010 WL 87964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding circumstantial evidence was sufficient to establish that complainant was not the defendant’s spouse when she was approximately ten years old when the sexual abuse began and referred to the defendant as her father
  • holding circumstantial evidence was sufficient to establish that complainant was not the defendant‘s spouse when she was approximately ten years old when the sexual abuse began and referred to the defendant as her father
  • in cumulation order involving several counts, judgment nunc pro tunc was proper to correct omission regarding which case’s sentence would be served first.
  • on similar facts, finding evidence supported no inference other than that required for guilt
  • on similar facts, finding evidence supported no inference other than that required for guilt
  • “A trial court may correct a cumulation order nunc pro tunc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Walker, Meier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.