Skip to main content

Stidham v. State

Citations

  • 750 So. 2d 1238
  • 1999 WL 1081397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that tuning forks were acceptable means of proving radar accuracy where two officers testified that tuning forks were used three times the day of the stop and that every time they were used, the radar “checked functional”
  • the appellant has a duty to show by plausible argument with supporting authorities how the lower court erred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pittman, P.J., Mills and Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.