Skip to main content

State v. Primm

Citations

  • 606 P.2d 112
  • 4 Kan. App. 2d 314
  • 1980 Kan. App. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the accuracy of the radar unit was adequately shown by the officer’s testimony regarding the internal calibrations and the tuning fork tests
  • holding that the accuracy of the radar unit was adequately shown by the officer's testimony regarding the internal calibrations and the tuning fork tests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parks, Abbott, Swinehart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.