Woods v. Kenan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a district court “can properly refuse reconsideration as a matter of law of the case”
• first citing In re Alpex Comput. Corp., 71 F.3d 353, 356 (10th Cir. 1995), then citing In re Bianucci, 4 F.3d 526, 528 (7th Cir. 1993)
• “So long as a matter is 4 properly preserved in a lower court, the fact that the lower court can properly refuse 5 reconsideration as a matter of law of the case of course does not prevent subsequent review on 6 appeal.” (simplified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).