Stewart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The overt act need not have been committed by the defendant; it is sufficient that the delivery, the overt act, be committed by someone else, i.e., a co-conspirator.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tilden v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1986-08-05· cited 30×
• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-08-11· cited 28×
• Alston v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-02-09· cited 26×
• Dougherty v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-06-09· cited 23×
• Holland v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2000-01-26· cited 13×
• Owens v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1982-07-15· cited 3×
• Morton v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-12-19
• Broomer v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-10-29
• State v. Rivers
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-03-31
• Hernandez-Martinez v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2023-11-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Whalen v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1981-07-06· cited 50×
• Holden v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1973-02-26· cited 42×
• Weick v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1980-07-09· cited 29×
• Kreisher v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1974-04-10· cited 20×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1979-11-19· cited 16×
• Hand v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1976-03-10· cited 13×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1973-03-06· cited 12×
• Grace v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1973-11-13· cited 11×
• Lewis v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1980-06-04· cited 5×