Appellate Court of Illinois· 1/12/2001

Stewart v. Jones

Citations

742 N.E.2d 896
252 Ill. Dec. 358
318 Ill. App. 3d 552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

requiring that the plaintiff meet the burden of both the first and second prongs of the dual capacity doctrine test
this court rejected similar arguments made by a plaintiff attempting to assert the dual capacity doctrine
dual-capacity doctrine did not apply to individual defendants who were employees of company-owned fertilizer business that employed plaintiff, even though individual defendants owned property where fertilizer business was located and where plaintiff’s injury had occurred
dual-capacity doctrine did not apply to individual defendants who were employees of company- owned fertilizer business that employed plaintiff, even though individual defendants owned property where fertilizer business was located and where plaintiff’s injury had occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Stewart v. Jones

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.