Sobczak v. Flaska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding admission of evidence of rollover accidents which property owner had witnessed more than 20 years before bulldozer rollover accident that injured the plaintiff worker
• upholding admission of evidence of rollover accidents which property owner had witnessed more than 20 years before bulldozer rollover accident that injured the plaintiff worker
• applying both prongs of the test to determine whether the dual capacity exception applied
• question of control decided as a matter of law where evidence presented was insufficient to create an issue of fact
• defendant told the plaintiff what to do and how to do it and supervised plaintiff in reassembling the bulldozer that caused the plaintiffs injury
• question of control decided as a matter of law where evidence presented was insufficient to create an issue of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).