Skip to main content

Atkins v. Deere & Co.

Citations

  • 685 N.E.2d 342
  • 177 Ill. 2d 222
  • 226 Ill. Dec. 239
  • 1997 Ill. LEXIS 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the ambiguity did not exist as a result of legislature’s silence
  • finding that the ambiguity did not exist as a result of legislature's silence
  • “a preamble constitutes a stronger expression of intent than does a passing comment made by a single legislator during legislative debates
  • causes of action which accrued prior to effective date of repeal are preserved
  • causes of action which accrued prior to effective date of repeal are preserved
  • where statutory language is ambiguous, preamble is among “quintessential sources” of legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMorrow, Heiple, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Atkins v. Deere & Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.