Supreme Court of Delaware· 3/5/1968
King v. State
Citations
- 239 A.2d 707
- 1968 Del. LEXIS 212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, “[t]he instant case is not a case of silence and failure to object; this is, rather, a case of an affirmative waiver.”
- explaining difference between the failure to object and an affirmative waiver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carey, Herrmann, Wolcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden and Charles M. Oberly, IIIThird Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 79×
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-10-11· cited 13×
- Pumphrey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2019-02-08
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2022-01-04
- Burrell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2024-12-02
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-01-23
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-02-06
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-03-14· cited 125×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1954-11-23· cited 48×
- Parson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1966-07-21· cited 31×
- Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1967-03-10· cited 19×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1965-07-23· cited 9×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1966-06-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.