Skip to main content

Stevenson v. State

Citations

  • 782 A.2d 249
  • 2001 Del. LEXIS 231
  • 2001 WL 674166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial judge’s contact with the murder victim and undisclosed request for assignment of the murder cases to him before indictment created an appearance of impropriety
  • noting the necessity that the judge disclose any information that could bear on his impartiality
  • regarding the predecessor provision to Rule 2.11, this Court observed that “[t]he specific instances prompting disqualification that are set forth in the Code do not exhaust all situations in which a judge’s impartiality may be reasonably questioned.”
  • regarding the predecessor provision to Rule 2.11, this Court observed that “[t]he specific instances prompting disqualification that are set forth in the Code do not exhaust all situations in which a judge’s impartiality may be reasonably questioned.”
  • “Under the unusual circumstances now revealed, we are forced to conclude that the trial judge should not have requested the murder case assignment prior to indictment in view of his prior contact with the victim in the suppression hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Berger, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.