Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Delaware· 5/8/1991

Los v. Los

Citations

  • 595 A.2d 381
  • 1991 Del. LEXIS 309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that disqualification on the basis of judicial bias “must stem from an extrajudicial sourse and result in an opinion on the merits on some basis other than what the judge learned from [her] participation in the case”
  • stating that disqualification on the basis of judicial bias “must stem from an extrajudicial course and result in an opinion on the merits on some basis other than what the judge learned from his participation in the case”
  • promulgating two-step analysis to determine if a personal bias or prejudice requires judicial recusal
  • “In the absence of genuine bias, a litigant should not be permitted to “judge shop” through the disqualification process.”
  • “When faced with a claim of personal bias or prejudice under Canon 3 C(1
  • “Where the basis for the alleged disqualification is a claim, under Canon 3 C(l), that the judge ‘has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party,’ no per se or automatic disqualification is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Los v. Los

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.