Supreme Court of Delaware· 7/26/2013
Sahin v. State
Citations
- 72 A.3d 111
- 2013 WL 3868097
- 2013 Del. LEXIS 389
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Cronic was not the proper test where defense counsel suggested to the court his client was lying
- finding Cronic was not the proper test where defense counsel suggested to the court his client was lying
- finding Cronic was not the proper test where defense counsel suggested to the court his client was lying
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berger, Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely, Steele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-07-21· cited 132×
- Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-10-08· cited 21×
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-05-30· cited 21×
- Sahin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-11-05· cited 17×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-11-08· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.