Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/27/1979
Sanchez v. State
Citations
- 589 S.W.2d 422
- 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the statements were voluntary and admissible because they were not made in response to interrogations or inquiry
- holding that the statements were voluntary and admissible because they were not made in response to interrogations or inquiry
- holding that the statements were voluntary and admissible because they were not made in response to interrogations or inquiry
- explaining that police officers had probable cause to arrest defendant where defendant displayed syringe
- defendant made admissible voluntary statement not in response to interrogation or inquiry
- defendant's statement after arrest that officers were lucky they caught him and his inquiries about whether someone \had squealed on him\ admissible as voluntary statements because they were not products of interrogation or responses to inquiry by officers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Davis, Dally
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Drew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-30· cited 420×
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-15· cited 294×
- Passmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-27· cited 165×
- Lindley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-07-14· cited 162×
- Briddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-23· cited 136×
- Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-16· cited 126×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-16· cited 122×
- Delgado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-24· cited 122×
- Trejo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-22· cited 87×
- Ramirez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-05-01· cited 77×
- Ex Parte RabornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-26· cited 72×
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-06-24· cited 64×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-24· cited 51×
- Henry Martinez Porter v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1983-07-18· cited 47×
- Borgen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-16· cited 44×
- Rogers v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1987-01-15· cited 44×
- Girndt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-30· cited 40×
- Boyington v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1985-11-14· cited 37×
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-29· cited 35×
- Badall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-01-31· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.