Skip to main content

Stevens v. People

Citations

  • 55 V.I. 550
  • 2011 WL 3490547
  • 2011 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • an improper application of law to fact is an abuse of discretion
  • “An abuse of discretion ‘arises only when the decision rests upon a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.’ ” (quoting Schneider v. Fried, 320 F.3d 396, 404 (3d Cir. 2003))
  • “An abuse of discretion ‘arises only when the decision rests upon a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.’ ” (quoting Schneider v. Fried, 320 F.3d 396, 404 (3d Cir. 2003))
  • “An abuse of discretion ‘arises only when the decision rests upon a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.’ ” (quoting Schneider v. Fried, 320 F.3d 396, 404 (3d Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Designated, Hodge, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.