Pelle v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that res judicata did not apply when plaintiffs previous “actions were brought in November and December 1997 (with amended complaints filed in April 1998), before the plaintiffs were fired in December 1998”
• “A district court judge considering a sentence that he imposed may 8 make findings as to his prior intention, and [the Ninth Circuit] ‘must take such statements at face 9 value.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).