Steven Scott Kildea v. Electro-Wire Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \employee\ is an individual who is actively working or who is temporarily laid off with a reasonable expectation of recall
• noting that although we review the district court's findings of fact for clear error, we review legal conclusions and mixed questions of law de novo
• noting that concluded that the code did not violate the FHA. See Oxford although we review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error, we House-C v. City of St. Louis, 77 F.3d 249 (8th Cir. 1996). review legal conclusions and mixed questions of law de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).