United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. North Star Steel Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “WARN uses the term 'back pay’ simply as a label to describe the daily rate of damages payable”
• holding that \WARN uses the term `back pay' simply as a label to describe the daily rate of damages payable\
• holding that \WARN uses the term `back pay' simply as a label to describe the daily rate of damages payable\
• pointing out that statutory construction principles require avoiding a construction that renders any provision superfluous
• “reject[ing] defendant’s argument that the use of phrase ‘back pay’ implies a lost earnings concept and, by so doing, renders the statutory language unclear.”
• “An employer who violates WARN is entitled to reduce its liability to its aggrieved employees only by payments within the categories set forth in Section 2104(a)(2) that it paid to the aggrieved employees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).