Steve Moore v. Citgo Refining & Chemicals C

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cost awards may not be reduced based on the prevailing party’s wealth
• \[R]educing or eliminating a prevailing party's cost award based on its wealth-either relative or absolute-is impermissible as a matter of law.\
• affirming a district court’s dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs’ claims because they responded, but failed to comply with, the district court’s two discovery orders
• “[R]educing or eliminating a prevailing party’s cost award based on its wealth—either relative or absolute—is impermissible as a matter of law.”
• affirming a district court’s dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs’ claims because they responded, but failed to comply with, the district court’s two discovery orders
• affirming the district court’s 4. Compelling Plaintiffs did not include a transcript of the attempted September 29, 2021, deposition, which presumably would have included a Certificate of Non-Appearance entered by the court reporter. (See Doc. 42 at 42

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).