Smith & Fuller, P.A. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court has authority to impose sanctions for inadvertent violation of a protective order governing confidential material disclosed in discovery
• holding that a protective order was an “order to provide or permit discovery” and within the scope of Rule 37(b)(2)
• stating that “[t]he affidavits of counsel may alone be sufficient proof” to establish the reasonable hourly rate
• stating that “[t]he affidavits of counsel may alone be sufficient proof” to establish the reasonable hourly rate
• stating that “[t]he affidavits of counsel may alone be sufficient proof” to establish the reasonable hourly rate
• stating that “[t]he affidavits of counsel may alone be sufficient proof” to establish the reasonable hourly rate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).