Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/17/1981
Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'n
Citations
- 631 P.2d 222
- 230 Kan. 115
- 1981 Kan. LEXIS 265
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a classification which may result in some inequality only violates equal protection if the classification is ‘irrelevant’ to the goals the State intended to achieve through passage of the statute
- stating that a classification which may result in some inequality only violates equal protection if the classification is `irrelevant' to the goals the State intended to achieve through passage of the statute
- stating that a classification which may result in some inequality only violates equal protection if the classification is “irrelevant” to the goals the State intended to achieve through passage of the statute
- examining new shortened statute of limitations for personal injury actions against healthcare providers without any suggestion this created a new cause of action
- affirming an unfortunate result as the injury to the plaintiff was not ascertainable until after the statute of limitations extinguished her right to bring the action
- shorter statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims does not violate the Kansas Constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Prager, Herd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.