State Ex Rel. Schneider v. Liggett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• provision requiring physicians to purchase malpractice insurance valid response to malpractice crisis, not violation of equal protection or due process
• provision requiring physicians to purchase malpractice insurance valid response to malpractice crisis, not violation of equal protection or due process
• doctor has no vested right to insist that rule permitting him to practice without liability insurance must remain unchanged for his benefit
• practice of medicine not a fundamental interest under Constitution; therefore, traditional rational relationship test applied
• practice of medicine not a fundamental interest under Constitution; therefore, traditional rational relationship test applied
• statute that requires doctors, but not dentists or nurses, to purchase malpractice liability insurance and pay a surcharge to the health care stabilization fund does not violate the Kansas Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).