Stephens v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “there is no exhaustion requirement for ERISA claims alleging statutory—rather than plan-based—violations,” like Mr. Whetstone does here
• “{The] exception to the exhaustion requirement [for § 502(a)(2) claims] does not embrace plan-based claims artfully dressed in statutory clothing, such as where a plaintiff seeks to avoid the exhaustion requirement [of § 502(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).