Monica M. Zipf v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing legislative history and limited administrative review procedure required by ERISA and concluding that Congress did not intend to require administrative exhaustion for claims of discrimination in violation of ERISA § 510
• “[S]tatutory interpretation is not only the obligation of the courts, it is a matter within their peculiar expertise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).