Stephen Redd v. Patricia Guerrero

Oral argument

• Argued

  49 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal preemption legislation relating to motor carriers under 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c)(1) did not supplant local regulation
• holding that the statute’s intent was not to “restrict existing safety regulatory 14 authority of a State”
• holding that presumptions from negative implication “grow[] weaker with each difference in the formulation of the provisions under inspection.”
• holding that presumptions from negative implication “grow[] weaker with each difference in the formulation of the provisions under inspection.”
• holding that rules which are “genuinely responsive to safety concerns” are exempted from preemption
• concluding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act’s safety exception extends to local regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).