Stenstrom Petroleum Services Group Inc. v. Mesch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that ‘[a] reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and cohesive arguments presented ([210 Ill. 2d R. 341(h)(7)]
• facts weighed against a finding that a spreadsheet could constitute a trade secret because the sheet could be reproduced in two to three days and the bulk of the information was “primarily public”
• “It is well settled that ‘[a] reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and cohesive arguments presented ([210 Ill. 2d R 341(h)(7)]), and it is not a repository into which an appellant may foist the burden of argument and research’ ”
• involving trade secret misappropriation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).