Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/7/2007

Stenstrom Petroleum Services Group Inc. v. Mesch

Citations

  • 874 N.E.2d 959
  • 375 Ill. App. 3d 1077
  • 314 Ill. Dec. 594
  • 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 1004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well settled that ‘[a] reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and cohesive arguments presented ([210 Ill. 2d R. 341(h)(7)]
  • facts weighed against a finding that a spreadsheet could constitute a trade secret because the sheet could be reproduced in two to three days and the bulk of the information was “primarily public”
  • “It is well settled that ‘[a] reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and cohesive arguments presented ([210 Ill. 2d R 341(h)(7)]), and it is not a repository into which an appellant may foist the burden of argument and research’ ”
  • involving trade secret misappropriation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stenstrom Petroleum Services Group Inc. v. Mesch

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.