Multiut Corp. v. Draiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting access to customer list and requiring employees to sign confidentiality agreements enough to show that customer list was a trade secret
• “[i]ssues raised in the notice of appeal but not raised or argued to this court are generally deemed waived”
• “[i]ssues raised in the notice of appeal but not raised or argued to this court are generally deemed waived”
• “Customer lists and pricing information have been recognized as trade secrets, although such determinations have hinged on the facts of a case.”
• “To claim protection as a trade secret [under Illinois law], a plaintiff must show that: (1) the information was sufficiently secret to give it a competitive advantage; and (2) affirmative measures were taken to prevent others from acquiring or using the information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).